While, the secondary rules kind of spiral from the primary ones. The primary structure confers duties to the citizens of a state, forcing them to perform certain functions or refrain from committing specified acts. He saw it as an evolution of the ‘primary’ laws into the ‘secondary’ law structure. Hart put forward a theory that saw the positivist school of jurisprudence in good light. This habit was a tenet among the people subjected to such law and order, as the sovereign polices and reaches out to the people with armed forces who do not abide by his decree. He proposed that the orders from the sovereign was unquestionable and to be followed by one and all. These sanctions could be ‘punitive’, i.e., punishable by money and life, or ‘privative’, i.e., depriving the offender of his rights. They are combined to be seen that ‘all laws as coercive orders from a sovereign that obliges the people with duties that do not apply to the sovereign himself, failing which the people are threatened by a formal sanction’. ‘The Province of Jurisprudence Determined’ was one of John Austin’s works that described the three aspects of classical legal positivism. This canon-theory and its postulates can be seen as the third-party intervention in the settlement of any dispute from neutral grounds and concluding the best possible solution available to suit social structure.

The legal positivism in its most efficient form is bound to serve maximum benefit to each member of society. Another aspect of legal positivism is the prevention of judiciary panel or the convening judge to impose their predispositioned regards in or associated to a case under the study of court. Due to the identification of written set of laws, those who seek justice are never denuded of what’s rightfully theirs. This type of a belief system happens to be beneficial in a lot of ways. The basis of this classification is purely based upon calculative justification and not based on moral values. These have been ‘enlisted’ over the course of time by a society or state and its governing organizations. It has a clear demarcation between what is permitted and acceptable to suit social order and what is not. Here, no target block is treated as superior. This state might not be completely achievable but the possibility of achievement is to be kept maximum at all times by its practitioners. It may be seen as an ideal state defined by a specified set of values or guidelines to maintain stability in the system.

Twistit by positwist